The Graham family was more mindful than most newspaper owners that fixating on quarterly financial results can be harmful to the long-term health of a company. But even the Post had to have one eye on its stock price. And that lagging price was a factor in its eventual sale. The stock’s price led also to newsroom cutbacks that diminished the paper’s quality.
Many years ago I interviewed a large number of stock analysts and asked them whether publicly traded newspaper companies were good or bad for journalism. They were nearly unanimous in saying it was bad because it forced the companies to pay excessive attention to the bottom line. (“Taking Stock —Journalism and the Publicly Traded Newspaper Company”, Cranberg, Bezanson, Soloski (Iowa State Univ. Press, 2001).) So, does that mean the era of a Bezos-owned Post will be good news for readers? Not necessarily. Bezos has never worked on a newspaper and has no tradition of family newspaper ownership. What he knows about the Post is only as a reader.
I say “only” but that stands for a great deal. What serious readers of newspapers treasure is their reliability and comprehensiveness. Compromise either and their value diminishes.
Jeff Bezos did not accumulate the wealth to buy the Post by being a stupid businessman. He would be that if he makes inroads in the quality of the Post for short-term gain.
Since Bezos has not worked in journalism he has none of the skills needed to manage a newspaper. But there are people with such skill and Bezos ought to know how to locate them. Above all, he needs to convince them of his vision that the best days of the Washington Post are ahead.
No comments:
Post a Comment