Thus, when Benghazi was in the news, so, too, was Steve King, pontificating that “If you link Watergate and Iran-Contra together and multiply it times maybe 10 or so, you’re going to get in the zone where Benghazi is.” King has no special knowledge about the events in Benghazi, but that didn’t keep him from pretending otherwise and the press from abetting the pretense.
The respected Des Moines Register once made the mistake of endorsing King. It subsequently retracted the endorsement in an editorial calling for the election of King’s opponent and attacking King’s “divisive, fear-mongering commentary.”
Esquire Magazine once put King on its list of 10 worst congressmen, observing that “King believes himself to be clever, and his list of idiot declarations is probably the longest in Washington.”
King is no dummy. He certainly knows how to fool the press into giving him space. He also had enough smarts to avoid running for Tom Harkin’s recently vacated seat in the U.S. Senate, apparently figuring that Iowans would not react favorably to his brand of demagogy in a statewide race.
But it’s long past time for the press to quit giving King a soap box for no better reason than an ability to churn out provocations that are better left unsaid.
No comments:
Post a Comment