WELCOME to the debut of “The Truth Is!”, a blog of reporting and commentary that aims to be informative, thoughtful and provocative. At least initially, the blog will have a strong heartland flavor by virtue of the connection of a number of us to Cowles family journalism. I am former editor of the Des Moines Register’s opinion pages. Another contributor, Michael Gartner, is former editor of the paper; he later served as president of NBC News. Another former Register editor who has agreed to contribute, Geneva Overholser, is director of the University of Southern California’s Annenberg school of journalism. Followers of the blog will have access also to the work of Herbert Strentz of Des Moines, a close Register and other newspaper watcher who once headed Drake University’s journalism school. Bill Leonard, a longtime Register editorial writer, will add insights.

“The Truth Is!” will be supervised by my daughter, Marcia Wolff, a communications lawyer for 20 years with Arnold and Porter (Washington, D.C.). Invaluable technical assistance in assembling and maintaining the blog is provided by my grandsons Julian Cranberg, a college first-year, and Daniel Wolff, a high school senior.

If you detect a whiff of nepotism in this operation, so be it. All of it is strictly a labor of love. —Gil Cranberg

Tuesday, August 27, 2013

Gilbert Cranberg: GLENN GREENWALD'S PARTNER

“Partner” is a versatile word that can mean several different things, from a business relationship to a personal one. Sometimes it means opposite things, as in “marriage partner” and when used to describe an extra-marital arrangement.

Lately, the New York Times used “partner” in a way so confusing it’s impossible to divine the paper’s meaning. In referring to David Michael Miranda as Glenn Greenwald’s “partner,” the Times leaves readers with no clue to what it is describing. 

Greenwald is the journalist who has been involved with Edward Snowden in disseminating secret government documents. Miranda, who lives in Brazil, figured in the news recently when he was detained for questioning in London by British officials. 

If Miranda’s questioning related to the illegal release of documents, his tie to Greenwald took on a legitimate news angle. But what precisely is that tie? Describing Miranda as Greenwald’s “partner” leaves open the possibility that he, too, was engaged in possibly illegal conduct. But if the relationship is purely personal, the press has no business prying into it. In that case, “partner” is a perfectly acceptable way to describe it – except for the question of clarity. News organizations are in the business of clarifying issues not obfuscating them. Thus Greenwald may be in the uncomfortable and unexpected position of having to reveal his private life because of the journalistic imperative to leave no loose ends uncovered.

If Miranda is going to continue to be in the news, the Times probably has no choice but to refer again to his relationship to Greenwald. But describing the pair simply as “partners” is uninformative and potentially misleading. The Times needs to clarify what it means when it uses the word “partner”. 

Greenwald may have anticipated complications by getting involved with Snowden in the release of secret documents but he probably did not foresee that the nature of his relationship with some guy in Brazil would be one of them.

No comments: