WELCOME to the debut of “The Truth Is!”, a blog of reporting and commentary that aims to be informative, thoughtful and provocative. At least initially, the blog will have a strong heartland flavor by virtue of the connection of a number of us to Cowles family journalism. I am former editor of the Des Moines Register’s opinion pages. Another contributor, Michael Gartner, is former editor of the paper; he later served as president of NBC News. Another former Register editor who has agreed to contribute, Geneva Overholser, is director of the University of Southern California’s Annenberg school of journalism. Followers of the blog will have access also to the work of Herbert Strentz of Des Moines, a close Register and other newspaper watcher who once headed Drake University’s journalism school. Bill Leonard, a longtime Register editorial writer, will add insights.

“The Truth Is!” will be supervised by my daughter, Marcia Wolff, a communications lawyer for 20 years with Arnold and Porter (Washington, D.C.). Invaluable technical assistance in assembling and maintaining the blog is provided by my grandsons Julian Cranberg, a college first-year, and Daniel Wolff, a high school senior.

If you detect a whiff of nepotism in this operation, so be it. All of it is strictly a labor of love. —Gil Cranberg

Monday, January 28, 2013

Gilbert Cranberg: PUT THE SPOTLIGHT ON JUDGES

A January 26 New York Times editorial ("A Court Upholds Republican Chicanery: Using phony Senate sessions, lawmakers tried to keep two federal agencies from operating") sharply criticized a federal appeals court ruling that throws into disarray President Obama’s appointments to the National Labor Relations Board and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The recess appointments invalidated by the three-judge court were an attempt by the Obama administration to avoid roadblocks erected by Republican critics of the agencies.

The editorial did not identify the judges. Readers had to plow through nearly to the end of a lengthy Times story about the ruling to learn the name of one of the judges, David B. Sentelle.
The Times did its readers no service by withholding information about the judges who severely clipped the power of the president to fill vacancies. The headline’s use of the term “Republican chicanery” all but invited readers to wonder if the ruling had a political aroma. The Times story stoked that suspicion when it reported that the three judges were “all appointed by Republicans.” Indeed, in 1994 Sentelle figured prominently in the appointment of Kenneth Starr to replace the more moderate Robert Fiske as independent counsel to investigate President Clinton. Starr hounded Clinton through much of his second term.
When judges hide behind their robes to make arguably political decisions, the press should so inform readers. At the very least, the judges who participate in court rulings should be identified. The identification should include tendencies toward partisanship. I shouldn’t have had to dig up Sentelle’s role in harassing a Democratic president; the Times should have done that.


No comments: