WELCOME to the debut of “The Truth Is!”, a blog of reporting and commentary that aims to be informative, thoughtful and provocative. At least initially, the blog will have a strong heartland flavor by virtue of the connection of a number of us to Cowles family journalism. I am former editor of the Des Moines Register’s opinion pages. Another contributor, Michael Gartner, is former editor of the paper; he later served as president of NBC News. Another former Register editor who has agreed to contribute, Geneva Overholser, is director of the University of Southern California’s Annenberg school of journalism. Followers of the blog will have access also to the work of Herbert Strentz of Des Moines, a close Register and other newspaper watcher who once headed Drake University’s journalism school. Bill Leonard, a longtime Register editorial writer, will add insights.

“The Truth Is!” will be supervised by my daughter, Marcia Wolff, a communications lawyer for 20 years with Arnold and Porter (Washington, D.C.). Invaluable technical assistance in assembling and maintaining the blog is provided by my grandsons Julian Cranberg, a college first-year, and Daniel Wolff, a high school senior.

If you detect a whiff of nepotism in this operation, so be it. All of it is strictly a labor of love. —Gil Cranberg

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Gilbert Cranberg: HEADS IN THE SAND ON IRAQ

A recent NBC News Poll listed ending the war in Iraq as Barack Obama’s signal first-term achievement. It’s safe to assume that the public also would rank the war as the low point of his predecessor’s time in office.

But let’s not dump on Bush alone for the war. There is plenty of blame to share. In fact, Bush is in highly distinguished company. Leading public figures, on both sides of the political aisle, lent their names to the war. Even when the Bush administration insisted on financing the war by credit card, there was no diminution of the gung-ho spirit for war against a far-away country that had not been hostile to us.

Only a single news organization, the Washington bureau of the relatively small Knight-Ridder chain, consistently raised questions about the administration’s case for war. Even some papers in the chain declined to run some of the bureau’s critical dispatches.

All in all, a dispiriting picture. And if there are lessons to be drawn, they almost certainly will not be, because the press has stuck its head in the sand and declined systematic examination of how it botched coverage of the government’s dishonest campaign for an unnecessary war.

I once suggested that an independent and thorough inquiry be made by a team of social scientists to examine how the press could have gotten it so wrong. (http://www.niemanwatchdog.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=ask_this.view&askthisid=00261).

The suggestion went nowhere, but it is still worth pursuing, especially when memories of the decision-making are relatively fresh. The least we can gain from a costly and unwarranted war is insight into how to prevent a repetition.

No comments: