WELCOME to the debut of “The Truth Is!”, a blog of reporting and commentary that aims to be informative, thoughtful and provocative. At least initially, the blog will have a strong heartland flavor by virtue of the connection of a number of us to Cowles family journalism. I am former editor of the Des Moines Register’s opinion pages. Another contributor, Michael Gartner, is former editor of the paper; he later served as president of NBC News. Another former Register editor who has agreed to contribute, Geneva Overholser, is director of the University of Southern California’s Annenberg school of journalism. Followers of the blog will have access also to the work of Herbert Strentz of Des Moines, a close Register and other newspaper watcher who once headed Drake University’s journalism school. Bill Leonard, a longtime Register editorial writer, will add insights.

“The Truth Is!” will be supervised by my daughter, Marcia Wolff, a communications lawyer for 20 years with Arnold and Porter (Washington, D.C.). Invaluable technical assistance in assembling and maintaining the blog is provided by my grandsons Julian Cranberg, a college first-year, and Daniel Wolff, a high school senior.

If you detect a whiff of nepotism in this operation, so be it. All of it is strictly a labor of love. —Gil Cranberg

Monday, September 16, 2013

Gilbert Cranberg: PUTIN’S SPECIAL TREATMENT

Did Vladimir V. Putin, who wrote a by-lined op-ed piece for the New York Times Sept. 12, receive favored treatment from the Times? He certainly seems to have.

In my experience, when contributors submit a piece to the Times, before it is published they are required to justify the accuracy of everything in it. The Times has demanding copy editors who go over every word with a fine-tooth comb.

But Putin was allowed to write, without contradiction or elaboration, that “there is every reason to believe [that poison gas] was used not by the Syrian Army, but by opposition forces, to provoke intervention by their powerful foreign patrons, who would be siding with the fundamentalists.”

The Times public editor, Margaret Sullivan, questioned the Times editorial page editor, Andrew Rosenthal, about that very passage. Rosenthal justified using it, saying “it falls into the category of opinion.”

Factual statements, unlike opinion, are verifiable. If Putin believes that the Syrian government did not use poison gas, what is the basis for his belief? Did the Times ask him? After all, the Obama administration was preparing military strikes against the government of Syria and asking for congressional approval of the strikes because of its certainty that Syria was responsible for the use of poison gas.

The Times had a huge scoop when Putin’s unsolicited article came in over the transom. By the Times’ own account, it “quickly decided to publish it” and it was posted on the paper’s Web site by the evening it was received.

Why the rush? There is no indication that Putin was shopping the piece around. The public would have been a lot better served if the Times had not short-circuited its procedures and instead required of Putin what it requires of all other contributors –namely, proof of accuracy.

No comments: