WELCOME to the debut of “The Truth Is!”, a blog of reporting and commentary that aims to be informative, thoughtful and provocative. At least initially, the blog will have a strong heartland flavor by virtue of the connection of a number of us to Cowles family journalism. I am former editor of the Des Moines Register’s opinion pages. Another contributor, Michael Gartner, is former editor of the paper; he later served as president of NBC News. Another former Register editor who has agreed to contribute, Geneva Overholser, is director of the University of Southern California’s Annenberg school of journalism. Followers of the blog will have access also to the work of Herbert Strentz of Des Moines, a close Register and other newspaper watcher who once headed Drake University’s journalism school. Bill Leonard, a longtime Register editorial writer, will add insights.

“The Truth Is!” will be supervised by my daughter, Marcia Wolff, a communications lawyer for 20 years with Arnold and Porter (Washington, D.C.). Invaluable technical assistance in assembling and maintaining the blog is provided by my grandsons Julian Cranberg, a college first-year, and Daniel Wolff, a high school senior.

If you detect a whiff of nepotism in this operation, so be it. All of it is strictly a labor of love. —Gil Cranberg

Thursday, September 19, 2013

Gilbert Cranberg: How the Times Failed Its Readers

On Sept. 12 a New York Times editorial said that it “seems certain” that the government of Syria carried out chemical attacks on Aug. 21 that killed so many Syrians. Why then did the Times allow its pages to be used the same day by Russia’s President, Vladimir V. Putin, to declare “there is every reason to believe” that poison gas “was used not by the Syrian army, but by opposition forces, to provoke intervention by their powerful foreign patrons….”?

The Times is a very good newspaper, but it is not perfect. Imperfection was vividly on display in the way it handled Putin’s op-ed article. Instead of rushing as it did into print with it, it should have asked Putin to explain his unsupported “every reason to believe” defense of Syria’s government.  

To the paper’s credit, it gave prominent coverage to the findings of the United Nations inspectors that discredited Putin’s defense of Syria’s government. In a Sept. 18 front page story headed “Data in Gas Attacks Points to Assad Top Forces”, the Times reported, “details buried in the United Nations report on the Syrian chemical weapons attack point directly at elite military formations loyal to President Bashar al Assad, some of the strongest findings to date that suggest the government gassed its own people.”

In addition, the Times conducted “independent and separate calculations” that show it was government and not rebel forces that were responsible for the chemical attacks.

If readers followed the Times closely, they would realize that it was contradicting Putin’s Sept. 12 piece in the Times. But readers should not have to connect the dots on their own. The paper, having carelessly run Putin’s unsupported allegations, should have cited his claims and then noted how the findings of the UN inspectors disproved them.  

No comments: