David Brooks is one of the more conservative contributors in the New York Times stable of regular columnists. So why did Brooks in his July 12 column take such a hard crack at the GOP for its performance on immigration reform? Because Brooks, unlike a lot of columnists, refreshingly departs now and then from knee jerk right-wing positions.
Some columnists believe they should be predictable. They seem to think they fill a niche that either readers or editors who buy the columns have come to expect. Others, a distinct minority, either tire of repeating themselves or believe readers deserve a change of pace or are entitled to intellectual honesty. I don’t know what motivated Brooks when he wrote his July 12 column; whatever it was, he deserves credit for his willingness to attack the status quo on immigration as a “tragedy for the country and political suicide for Republicans.”
For years, my two favorite columnists were Mary McGrory and William Safire. They were poles apart ideologically but both had in common an appetite for reporting. You could always count on them to dig into their subjects and back their opinions with fresh information. If you disagreed with their policy positions, you at least came away from their columns better informed because they were reliable and conscientious reporters. I miss them both.
I define opinion writing as reporting plus. The plus is the point of view expressed. Pure opinion in my view is essentially worthless as journalism. Unless the writer supports opinion with facts, the effort might be clever and entertaining but ultimately unpersuasive.
Cramming a piece with facts is not necessarily good journalism or a service to readers. If the facts are cherry-picked, readers can be left with a wrong impression. They need to be wary of journalism that is true but false -- that is, journalism that fails the test of accuracy by what is withheld from readers. Unfortunately, journalism is not without its unscrupulous practitioners.
WELCOME to the debut of “The Truth Is!”, a blog of reporting and commentary that aims to be informative, thoughtful and provocative. At least initially, the blog will have a strong heartland flavor by virtue of the connection of a number of us to Cowles family journalism. I am former editor of the Des Moines Register’s opinion pages. Another contributor, Michael Gartner, is former editor of the paper; he later served as president of NBC News. Another former Register editor who has agreed to contribute, Geneva Overholser, is director of the University of Southern California’s Annenberg school of journalism. Followers of the blog will have access also to the work of Herbert Strentz of Des Moines, a close Register and other newspaper watcher who once headed Drake University’s journalism school. Bill Leonard, a longtime Register editorial writer, will add insights.
“The Truth Is!” will be supervised by my daughter, Marcia Wolff, a communications lawyer for 20 years with Arnold and Porter (Washington, D.C.). Invaluable technical assistance in assembling and maintaining the blog is provided by my grandsons Julian Cranberg, a college first-year, and Daniel Wolff, a high school senior.
If you detect a whiff of nepotism in this operation, so be it. All of it is strictly a labor of love. —Gil Cranberg
No comments:
Post a Comment