WELCOME to the debut of “The Truth Is!”, a blog of reporting and commentary that aims to be informative, thoughtful and provocative. At least initially, the blog will have a strong heartland flavor by virtue of the connection of a number of us to Cowles family journalism. I am former editor of the Des Moines Register’s opinion pages. Another contributor, Michael Gartner, is former editor of the paper; he later served as president of NBC News. Another former Register editor who has agreed to contribute, Geneva Overholser, is director of the University of Southern California’s Annenberg school of journalism. Followers of the blog will have access also to the work of Herbert Strentz of Des Moines, a close Register and other newspaper watcher who once headed Drake University’s journalism school. Bill Leonard, a longtime Register editorial writer, will add insights.

“The Truth Is!” will be supervised by my daughter, Marcia Wolff, a communications lawyer for 20 years with Arnold and Porter (Washington, D.C.). Invaluable technical assistance in assembling and maintaining the blog is provided by my grandsons Julian Cranberg, a college first-year, and Daniel Wolff, a high school senior.

If you detect a whiff of nepotism in this operation, so be it. All of it is strictly a labor of love. —Gil Cranberg

Thursday, October 10, 2013

Gilbert Cranberg: LET’S HEAR IT FOR ROBERT BROUT

Three physicists contributed to the work for which the Nobel prize in physics was awarded this year. They are Peter W. Higgs, Francois Englert and Robert Brout. However, only two of the three –Higgs and Englert – actually won the Nobel. Brout, poor fellow, won nothing, not even a slice of the $1.2 prize money. The New York Times, after describing Brout’s work, explained that he, a professor at Cornell University, “might logically have shared the Nobel if he were alive today; the prize is not awarded posthumously.” Brout died in 2011.

That makes no sense. The prize is awarded not for longevity but for work done during a professional lifetime, which can be over a period of years. Science celebrates human reason. It borders on the irrational for two scientists to co-discover a major breakthrough and if one of them dies prematurely, for the survivor to reap all of the rewards and honors while the deceased receives perhaps a footnote. Death should not be allowed to erase a talented person’s accomplishments. By all accounts, Brout’s contribution was Nobel-worthy and he, or his heirs, deserved the recognition, and his fair share of the cash.

Pulitzer Prizes are awarded more logically. Deceased persons are eligible for awards for the work they performed. Period. Death is not a disqualifier.

Nobel prizes are governed by the terms of Alfred Nobel’s will. It’s ironic that the brilliance of the work celebrated by the Nobel prizes is not matched by the thinking that went into Nobel’s will. By ruling out posthumous awards, the will denies recognition to some of the world’s most creative minds. In fact, both of this year’s Nobel Laureates in physics could well have been made ineligible by the passage of a bit more time, inasmuch as Peter Higgs is 84 and Francois Englert is 80.

So for what it is worth, let’s hear it for Robert Brout, who was cheated by death out of his fair share of the limelight.

No comments: