WELCOME to the debut of “The Truth Is!”, a blog of reporting and commentary that aims to be informative, thoughtful and provocative. At least initially, the blog will have a strong heartland flavor by virtue of the connection of a number of us to Cowles family journalism. I am former editor of the Des Moines Register’s opinion pages. Another contributor, Michael Gartner, is former editor of the paper; he later served as president of NBC News. Another former Register editor who has agreed to contribute, Geneva Overholser, is director of the University of Southern California’s Annenberg school of journalism. Followers of the blog will have access also to the work of Herbert Strentz of Des Moines, a close Register and other newspaper watcher who once headed Drake University’s journalism school. Bill Leonard, a longtime Register editorial writer, will add insights.

“The Truth Is!” will be supervised by my daughter, Marcia Wolff, a communications lawyer for 20 years with Arnold and Porter (Washington, D.C.). Invaluable technical assistance in assembling and maintaining the blog is provided by my grandsons Julian Cranberg, a college first-year, and Daniel Wolff, a high school senior.

If you detect a whiff of nepotism in this operation, so be it. All of it is strictly a labor of love. —Gil Cranberg

Friday, April 4, 2014

Gilbert Cranberg: CHRISTIE’S CHARADE

The report issued March 26 by the lawyers for Chris Christie could well be considered worthless. The report, as could have been predicted, absolved Christie of any responsibility for the George Washington Bridge scandal. If the lawyers had found, and reported, any suspect conduct by Christie, they might have lost their licenses to practice law.

That’s because lawyers owe their responsibility to the client. In this case the client is arguably not the taxpayers who paid for the report, but the person who engaged them -- Chris Christie. The reporters who covered the charade Christie staged in the form of a press conference neglected to probe the nature of the relationship between Christie and the authors of the report the press conference ostensibly was called to discuss. Christie browbeat the reporters for the way they phrased questions and he belittled their professionalism; they deserved the scorn he heaped on them, but not for the reasons he cited. Instead, they should have made the obligations owed to Christie by the authors of the report the centerpiece of the press conference questioning.

Christie’s bulldozer tactics worked this time. But more reports are in the wings. Reporters have time to brush up on how not to be intimidated by a bully in the guise of a governor.

No comments: