WELCOME to the debut of “The Truth Is!”, a blog of reporting and commentary that aims to be informative, thoughtful and provocative. At least initially, the blog will have a strong heartland flavor by virtue of the connection of a number of us to Cowles family journalism. I am former editor of the Des Moines Register’s opinion pages. Another contributor, Michael Gartner, is former editor of the paper; he later served as president of NBC News. Another former Register editor who has agreed to contribute, Geneva Overholser, is director of the University of Southern California’s Annenberg school of journalism. Followers of the blog will have access also to the work of Herbert Strentz of Des Moines, a close Register and other newspaper watcher who once headed Drake University’s journalism school. Bill Leonard, a longtime Register editorial writer, will add insights.

“The Truth Is!” will be supervised by my daughter, Marcia Wolff, a communications lawyer for 20 years with Arnold and Porter (Washington, D.C.). Invaluable technical assistance in assembling and maintaining the blog is provided by my grandsons Julian Cranberg, a college first-year, and Daniel Wolff, a high school senior.

If you detect a whiff of nepotism in this operation, so be it. All of it is strictly a labor of love. —Gil Cranberg

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Gilbert Cranberg:  WHAT WAS THAT ALL ABOUT?

It says something about the culture that days after the Super Bowl the commercials shown during the game remain a lively topic of conversation. The way they are being critiqued and reviewed it’s almost as though they have achieved the status of an art form.

Would that the tycoons who sponsor everyday television commercials pay closer attention to what they are buying. Where I live, the usual comment after watching most ads is, “What was that all about?” The creative types who produce the ads seem too often to be attempting, and succeeding, in being cryptic and obscure. It is sometimes a challenge even to figure out the product being advertised.

The commercial that best exemplifies what I have in mind shows a man and a boy playing catch. The youngster’s form is terrible. The father’s is even worse. The ball rolls under a nearby car of indeterminate make. The ad may or may not be for the car, a Volkswagen? I cannot be sure. The only thing I am sure about is that the automaker, if the ad is indeed for a car, should withhold payment to the ad agency and send the ad-makers back to the drawing board.

The commercials that are most problematic feature verbalizing animals. Why would a person of normal human intelligence take guidance from a source of lesser knowledge, say a gecko? Yet a major insurer, Geico, saturates the airwaves with commercials that play on the similarity between Geico and Gecko. Get it? Geico is a Warren Buffet-owned company. You can be sure that Buffett did not become super-wealthy by consulting members of the animal kingdom.

I don’t mind commercial breaks. Ads are informational messages and the information can be useful. But when ads puzzle rather than inform they are a waste of the viewer’s time and the sponsor’s money.

So here’s for more ads that are at least intelligible. Clever is fine, but enough of leaving television viewers asking “What was that all about?”

No comments: